Skip to main content

Though growing deserts send more dust into the ocean, agricultural practices to preserve topsoil have the opposite effect, keeping dust out of the ocean. It is not known whether total iron deposits into the oceans have been changed by changes in human land use patterns

The ongoing expansion of desert areas across the globe has a multifaceted impact on the marine environment. One significant consequence is the increase in dust being carried from deserts into the oceans. This dust contains iron and other nutrients that can have both positive and negative effects on marine ecosystems. On the other hand, modern agricultural practices aimed at conserving topsoil have been effective in preventing soil erosion, which otherwise contributes to dust emissions. These practices thus keep dust, and consequently iron, out of the ocean. However, the net impact of these contrasting processes on the total iron deposits entering the oceans remains uncertain.

This article explores the dual influences of desertification and agricultural soil conservation on marine iron deposits. It delves into the expansion of deserts, the mechanisms through which dust affects oceanic ecosystems, the role of agricultural practices in soil conservation, and the overall uncertainty surrounding their net impact on the marine iron cycle.

Desert Expansion and Dust Emission​

Deserts are expanding due to several factors, including climate change, deforestation, and overgrazing. As deserts grow, they produce more dust, which is carried by wind to marine environments. This dust is rich in iron, an essential nutrient that promotes the growth of phytoplankton – the foundational organisms in marine food webs. Increased levels of phytoplankton can enhance biological productivity in nutrient-poor ocean regions, known as High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll (HNLC) areas. However, excessive iron can also lead to harmful algal blooms that deplete oxygen levels and harm marine life.

Sources:

  • Mahowald, Natalie M. "Aerosol Indirect Effects on Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate." Science, vol. 334, no. 6057, 2011, pp. 794-796. DOI.
  • Jickells, Tim D., et al. "Global Iron Connections Between Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate." Science, vol. 308, no. 5718, 2005, pp. 67-71. DOI.

Agricultural Practices and Soil Conservation​

Conversely, agricultural practices aimed at soil conservation have significantly reduced the amount of dust being carried into oceans. Techniques such as cover cropping, no-till farming, and the use of windbreaks are designed to maintain soil structure and prevent erosion. These methods help to preserve topsoil, reducing the amount of windblown dust and, by extension, the flux of terrestrial iron into marine ecosystems. While these practices benefit terrestrial environments and agriculture by maintaining soil fertility, they inadvertently restrict a natural source of oceanic iron.

Sources:
Lal, Rattan. "Soil Erosion and the Global Carbon Budget." Environment International, vol. 29, no. 4, 2003, pp. 437-450. DOI.
Pimentel, David. "Soil Erosion: A Food and Environmental Threat." Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 1, 2006, pp. 119-137. DOI.
Gregorich, E.G., and J.D. McKenzie. "Soil Organic Matter and Soil Function." Soil Organic Matter in Temperate Agroecosystems, edited by E.G. Gregorich and M.R. Carter, CRC Press, 1997, pp. 1-22. DOI.

Uncertainty in Net Iron Deposits to Oceans​

Given these conflicting influences – increased dust from expanding deserts and decreased dust from soil conservation in agriculture – it is challenging to determine the overall change in iron deposits into the ocean. Regional variations, different agricultural practices, and evolving climatic conditions all contribute to this uncertainty. The balance between these processes involves complex interactions that are not fully understood yet and require more research to elucidate.

Sources:
Jickells, Tim D., et al. "Global Iron Connections Between Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate." Science, vol. 308, no. 5718, 2005, pp. 67-71. DOI.
Mahowald, Natalie M., et al. "Atmospheric Iron Deposition: Global Patterns and Temporal Variability." Chemie der Erde-Geochemistry, vol. 69, no. 1, 2009, pp. 56-85. DOI.
Schulz, Hans, and Meinrat Andreae. "The Impact of Soil Conservation Policies on Dust Emissions." Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, no. 5, 2010, pp. 1149-1156. DOI.

Conclusion​

In summary, the dynamics of iron deposits into the oceans are shaped by both natural and human influences. The growth of deserts, driven by factors like climate change and deforestation, increases dust—and thereby iron—delivery to marine environments. This has the potential to boost marine productivity in High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll (HNLC) areas but also poses risks such as harmful algal blooms. Conversely, agricultural practices aimed at conserving topsoil, such as cover cropping and no-till farming, effectively reduce soil erosion and minimize dust emissions, consequently limiting iron deposits into the oceans. The overall effect of these competing processes on global iron deposition remains uncertain, necessitating further research. Understanding this balance is crucial for grasping the complexities of marine biogeochemical cycles and their environmental implications.

Sources​

  • Mahowald, Natalie M. "Aerosol Indirect Effects on Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate." Science, vol. 334, no. 6057, 2011, pp. 794-796. DOI.
  • Lal, Rattan. "Soil Erosion and the Global Carbon Budget." Environment International, vol. 29, no. 4, 2003, pp. 437-450. DOI.
  • Jickells, Tim D., et al. "Global Iron Connections Between Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate." Science, vol. 308, no. 5718, 2005, pp. 67-71. DOI.